Crystal Palace: Luka Milivojevic may leave this summer

Crystal Palace midfielder Luka Milivojevic may depart Selhurst Park this summer, according to Inside Futbol.

The Lowdown: Milivojevic under Vieira

Milivojevic, who Roy Hodgson labelled as ‘outstanding’, has struggled for regular game time under Patrick Vieira this season.

The 31-year-old has made just 10 starts in all competitions this season, the latest of which came against Aston Villa on the weekend.

That was the club captain’s first Premier League start since February, and as he enters the final 12 months of his Selhurst Park contract, it looks as if an early exit could be on the cards.

The Latest: Olympiacos make move

Inside Futbol shared an update on Milivojevic’s future on Tuesday. They claim that former side Olympiacos are keen to bring him back to the club and have already made moves to get a deal in place.

The report adds that Milivojevic is considering his Eagles future and that he could even ask Steve Parish and Co. to terminate his contract.

The Verdict: Additions needed first

Vieira could be fairly short of midfield options in the summer, with Conor Gallagher set to return to Chelsea following an extremely successful season-long loan.

Cheikhou Kouyate is also out of contract at the end of June, so if Palace let Milivojevic go, Jairo Riedewald could be the club’s only senior defensive midfielder on the books.

Therefore, holding midfield additions could be needed first before the club possibly allow Milivojevic, who doesn’t appear to be fancied under Vieira, to cut short his five-year Palace stay.

In other news: Reliable journalist now reveals ‘secret’ Parish and Vieira plan from SE25. 

Tottenham join Wolves in transfer race for Palhinha

Tottenham Hotspur are reportedly eyeing up a move for Sporting CP defensive midfielder Joao Palhinha during the upcoming transfer window.

The Lowdown: Palhinha profiled

Despite having faced multiple spells on the sidelines due to injuries and suspensions, the 26-year-old has made 36 appearances in all competitions so far this season, scoring three goals during that time, as per Transfermarkt.

The 12-time Portugal international, whose contract with the Lisbon-based outfit isn’t set to expire until 2026, is expected to draw some big attention in the summer, with a move away from the Jose Alvalade looking likely and Wolves sniffing around.

[web_stories_embed url=”https://www.footballtransfertavern.com/web-stories/tottenham-newest-updates/” title=”Tottenham newest updates…” poster=”” width=”360″ height=”600″ align=”none”]

Following a fresh update, the Lilywhites seem to have well and truly joined the race.

The Latest: Interest from Spurs

According to Portuguese newspaper O Jogo (via Sport Witness), it’s claimed that Antonio Conte’s side ‘study the signing of a midfielder’ ahead of the new campaign, and are set to fight English rivals Wolves.

The source states that Sporting want to make €30m (£25.2m) with the sale of Palhinha, but reluctantly know ‘it will not be easy’ to get that sum, as Sport Witness claim the opportunity is there for a ‘bargain deal’.

The Verdict: Get it done

Should the 6 foot 2 maestro fail to win back his place in the Portugal squad, then the asking fee could be lowered even more come the end of May, and if this is this case, then it’s an absolute bargain of a move that Paratici should be all over.

The £24k-per-week ace is currently averaging a hugely impressive 3.1 tackles per 90 minutes in the top-flight this season – more than any Spurs player –  making him a very attractive prospect to offer protection in front of Conte’s defence.

Once described as a “special” player by his manager, Ruben Amorim, we feel Paratici and co should seriously consider a move for Palhinha, who has the potential to become a rock in the middle of the park under the Italian boss, and could help Spurs achieve that all-important place in the top four next term.

In other news, Tottenham officials are on the move today to watch a Conte target in action…

How England clung on to topple the No. 1 Test team

A day-by-day recap of how Joe Root’s team dug deep and India let a golden chance slip away

Melinda Farrell at the Ageas Bowl02-Sep-2018Day One – Why was Curran left out?England’s batting order has resembled a box full of mixed up jigsaw pieces this summer: all fine in themselves but just unable to slot together in a way that forms a coherent picture. Promoting Jonny Bairstow to No. 4 didn’t prevent the seemingly inevitable collapse and things looked grim when Mohammed Shami got one to nip back sharply and cannon into Ben Stokes’ pad. An unsuccessful review meant England were 86 for 6 and all at sea, much as they were in the first Test where they lost their first 7 wickets for 87. Sam Curran strode to the crease, just as he had done at Edgbaston, and for the second time in the series dragged England out of the mire with a precocious display of fearless batting. By the time his wicket fell Curran and the lower order had added 160 runs to England’s total and given them a fighting chance.Day Two – A rare loose shot from KohliEngland may have staved off calamity in the first innings but with Virat Kohli and Cheteshwar Pujara seemingly nailed to the crease and 142 runs on the board those efforts looked as feeble as King Canute trying to hold back the ocean. But, just as it seemed England were about to go under a wave of insurmountable runs, Curran – the man who was dropped from the side, remember? – angled one across Kohli, who reached and jabbed at it – perhaps unnecessarily – with hard hands. Alastair Cook, who has had a few problems in the slips of late, snaffled the catch and Kohli was on his way just short of a half-century and, while Pujara battled on to a magnificent hundred, England were able to prevent India’s lead swelling too much.Day Three – A new side to Ben StokesNot satisfied with shuffling the batting order between Tests, England – or, rather, Joe Root – decided to cut the deck between innings, sending Moeen Ali out to bat at first drop. The revamped order was only marginally more successful than in the previous innings: England losing their first four wickets for just 92. Keaton Jennings was pinged on the pads by Shami on the last ball before lunch and, resuming his over after the break, Shami welcomed Bairstow to the crease by pitching the ball up and generating enough reverse swing to send it thundering back into the stumps past a rather extravagant drive. But Stokes (Mark II, Conservative Version) played defensively and with admirable caution and, through partnerships with Root and Jos Buttler, arrested the slide and put England in a position where Curran (yes, him again) could establish a 244-run lead with the tail.Day Four – Moeen spins a Kohli trapIndia had just passed the halfway mark in the chase, Kohli and Ajinkya Rahane steadily chipping away at the lead while England kept up the pressure with Moeen bowling into the rough and fielders breathing down their necks. Moeen, who had taken five wickets in the first innings but had yet to strike in the second, landed one nicely and the ball squirted off Kohli’s bat straight to the region of Cook’s ankle. Cook, fielding at short leg, just couldn’t get his fingers around the ball to claim the catch but he got another chance on the very next delivery when the ball flicked Kohli’s glove, then pad, before lobbing straight to him. The crowd, recognising a Very Big Moment, held its collective breath as Kohli called for a review. Perhaps he thought it had come off his forearm. Perhaps it was sheer desperation. Perhaps he couldn’t believe that England’s second spinner, unwanted all summer, could deny him. No matter. Snicko and Moeen were not to be denied and Kohli was gone. Rahane fought on doggedly but the greatest danger for England was back in the dressing room and victory was only a matter of time and patience and a little Mo magic.

Spare a thought for Joe, burned

Brydon Coverdale28-Oct-20162:12

Brettig: Hard to completely justify Bird’s exclusion

Shaun Marsh deserves this Test selection. Those are words that have not always been true. At his lowest, at home to India in 2011-12, Marsh was to Test batting what Eric Moussambani was to Olympic swimming. Yet chances kept coming, and now, at 33, Marsh is repaying that faith. When he replaced the injured Usman Khawaja last summer, he made 182 in Hobart. His next Test innings was 130 when recalled in Colombo. Then came a Sheffield Shield ton this week.So yes, Marsh has earned his opportunity this time. He is David Warner’s incumbent Test opening partner, and has given the selectors no reason to drop him. At the WACA next week, Marsh will face South Africa in what will be his first Test at his home ground since that miserable 2011-12 summer.And when he does, spare a thought for Joe Burns.In Australia’s last Test before the tour of Sri Lanka, Burns was Man of the Match, his 170 and 65 in Christchurch having helped secure Australia a series win over New Zealand and the No.1 Test ranking. And he was coming off a home season in which he scored two Test hundreds and averaged 45.70, a very encouraging return in his first summer as a Test opener.But on a selection whim, Burns was axed in Sri Lanka, one of two men – along with Khawaja – who paid the price for Australia’s collective poor batting in the first two Tests. They were, in Khawaja’s words, “scapegoats”.At this point, let’s revisit the comments made by chairman of selectors Rod Marsh after Sri Lanka’s win in the first Test in Pallekele. “What else can we do really?” Marsh said. “We send them off to India, we send them to other parts of the world where the ball turns, we played Australia A series in India last year and they batted well against good spin bowling.”That statement is worth dissecting.Who is the “they” of whom Marsh is speaking? Indeed there was an Australia A tour of India last year, during which two “Tests” were played. Burns and Khawaja were the only two batsmen from that series who also played in the Tests against Sri Lanka. So they must be the “they”. Did “they” indeed bat well against good spin bowling? Khawaja batted four times with a high score of 41*. Burns played just one game and batted only once in it, for 8. He barely had a chance.Perhaps Marsh was referring to the one-day portion of that tour, in which both men scored more freely. But since when has 50-over white-ball cricket been relevant to picking a Test side? It is a game of different tempo, different fields, different attacks. Completely different.In any case, consider the one-day game in which both Burns and Khawaja scored hundreds in Chennai. ESPNcricinfo’s Alagappan Muthu was at the match, and described the situation thus: “An India A bowling attack which relied on medium pace and non-turning spinners proved incredibly appetising, and the two batsmen were ravenous”. Hardly valuable preparation for a Test series against Rangana Herath and co.It is true that there were Australia A batsmen who performed strongly in the “Tests” against India A. Cameron Bancroft scored Australia’s only century, a fine innings of 150, and was one of five men to also post fifties: Callum Ferguson, Marcus Stoinis, Travis Head and Peter Handscomb were the others. But none of those batsmen were in the Test squad in Sri Lanka. If they were the “they” of whom Marsh spoke, then “they” were irrelevant.A Sheffield Shield century this week was not enough for Joe Burns to be named in the Test squad•Getty ImagesIn fact, Burns embarked on the Sri Lankan tour with just a single first-class match in Asia to his name: the game against India A in which he scored 8 in the first innings and did not bat in the second. Before he was a scapegoat, he was a lamb to the slaughter. Still, he warmed up for the Test series with 72 against a Sri Lanka XI in Colombo, and then made 29 in the second innings of the first Test in Pallekele, which earned praise from Rod Marsh.”I thought Joe Burns played really well in that second innings after perhaps not looking too sound in the first innings,” Marsh said after the first Test. “He went to plan B and he looked really good until he didn’t hit one.” But in Galle, Burns fell in the first over of both innings – first against pace, then against spin – and was dumped. Could his second-innings method of dismissal – driving Herath in the air to cover – have cost him his place?That would seem especially harsh given the batsmen were told by captain Steven Smith and coach Darren Lehmann not to waste time in their chase of 413. “On a Galle wicket that was spinning quite a bit, the skipper and the coach asked the batting group to be a lot more proactive with the way we went about things,” Adam Voges recently said of that innings. With those words ringing in his ears, Burns went hard from the first over.In the same innings Khawaja shouldered arms first ball and was bowled, failing to pick a Dilruwan Perera arm ball. Khawaja has now been given quite a few chances in first-class cricket in Asia, including two Tests in Sri Lanka in 2011, yet has passed 50 just once from 15 innings. Burns has just the one fifty, too, but from only six innings. And four of those were in the recent Sri Lankan Tests.But on very scant evidence, Burns was viewed as expendable in Asian conditions. And thanks to Shaun Marsh’s Colombo century, he remains expendable at home. Like Marsh, Burns made a Shield century this week. Unlike Marsh, he will be playing a Shield game again next week. And probably for most of the summer. Khawaja, meanwhile, is back in the Test team.Yes, spare a thought for Joe Burns, the real scapegoat.

Di Venuto tries to mend Clarke's ways

Australia’s unassuming batting coach Michael di Venuto has the responsibility for rousing into form a batsman of far greater accomplishment than his own

Daniel Brettig in Derby26-Jul-2015Coaching can throw up numerous intriguing and bizarre dynamics, not least when a journeyman player and now mentor finds himself trying to solve the problems of a man acknowledged as one of his country’s great performers. It is not always easy. As the longtime Western Australia coach Daryl Foster once observed, his path to coaching the national team was forever blocked by that old rejoinder, “How many Tests did you play?”For Michael Di Venuto, Australia’s batting coach, the unvarnished surrounds of Derbyshire County Cricket Club are something like an English home, its minor key setting also similar to that of his Tasmanian homeland. For Australia’s captain Michael Clarke, such venues are footnotes, minor junctures in a career of bold, broad brushstrokes on the game’s biggest and brightest stages. Had he been scoring runs, it is highly doubtful Clarke would even have played.Yet in the week between Lord’s and Edgbaston, it is the unassuming Di Venuto who has primary responsibility for rousing into form a batsman of far greater accomplishment than his own. Clarke’s career numbers stand for favourable comparison to just about anyone in the game; Di Venuto’s handful of ODI matches reaped him 241 runs and a pair of half centuries. When discussing Clarke, there is a sense of enormous respect from mentor for pupil.”We’d like him to spend some more time in the middle obviously,” Di Venuto said of Clarke. “He’s had a couple of good starts in the Test matches, a caught and bowled to Moeen Ali up in Cardiff and a 32 not out in the second innings at Lord’s – I know circumstances were we were setting up a declaration. He would like some more time in the middle, there’s no doubt about that. He’s meticulous in his preparation, he’s playing well in the nets, he’s preparing well, he just needs a bit of luck. I’m sure a big score is not too far away.”We talk regularly like with all the batsmen. He’s pretty set in his ways what he wants to do, he knows how to go about it and how to get himself back to scoring runs. You can’t do that in the nets, you’ve got to do that out in the middle and at the moment, it’s not quite happening for him out in the middle. As happens every now and then as batsmen, you go through little patches where things don’t quite click. But he’s not too far away.”Di Venuto’s blend of simple advice, plenty of balls whirred down with the “dog thrower” and positive reinforcement has worked in numerous instances since he was chosen for the job by the team performance manager Pat Howard and former coach Mickey Arthur during the summer of 2012-13. Most notably, his reassurance of Steven Smith that he was “not out of form, just out of runs” early the following summer has reaped untold riches since, as the vice-captain chose to persist with an essentially sound method rather than tinkering.Nevertheless, the troubles confronting Clarke are of vaster dimensions than the brief blip in Smith’s progress 18 months ago. He has not made a century in any form of the game since he ignored back and hamstring problems to score a statuesque hundred against India in Adelaide last December. Moreover, Clarke’s once dancing feet have become worryingly leaden, leaving him a simple target for England’s bowlers thus far.

“Most teams these days and most batters know how people are trying to get them out. There’s no secrets running around, their plans are pretty stuck in place, so we work around that and try to combat that.”Michael di Venuto on dealing with the strategies of opposition bowlers

The tactic of setting a short leg and even leg gully, then probing outside off stump as Clarke hangs back in anticipation of bouncers has worked all too easily in recent times. At Cardiff, Clarke’s bat wafted without anything like due care and attention, while at Lord’s his pull shot at Mark Wood was the reactive last resort of a batsman entirely unable to get the bowlers operating on his terms.”Most teams these days and most batters know how people are trying to get them out,” Di Venuto said. “There’s no secrets running around, their plans are pretty stuck in place, so we work around that and try to combat that. As we do when we bowl, we want to try to push people back and then nick them off with the fuller ball. That’s a basic plan the majority of people in world cricket use.”True as Di Venuto’s words are, they serve mainly to make Clarke’s predicament look still worse. How can a player of such accomplishment fail to find a way around such tactics unless his technique and mentality are less than optimal? There is no evidence of physical infirmity, as hamstring surgery has freed up Clarke’s legs while the physio Alex Kountouris has not needed to work anywhere near as much on the captain’s back as at other times.”I thought he looked pretty good in the World Cup final for his 70-odd not out, no difference,” Di Venuto said. “And he looked pretty good when he couldn’t move when he scored a hundred when his back was no good against India. He’s moving around, he seems unrestricted and he hasn’t had a problem since, so I certainly don’t think that’s any reason why he hasn’t been able to get a big score of late.”One man who has helped Clarke at times down the years is Ricky Ponting. Despite their difficult relationship as captain and deputy, Ponting was often seen to be watching Clarke in the nets and assisting him in sorting out the kinks of a batting method that required freedom of movement and clarity of thought to continue counterpunching the world’s bowlers.Ponting, of course, was that rare cricketer to possess a superior batting record to Clarke’s own. For most of the time since Ponting retired, Clarke has relied on his own reserves of batting insight and muscle memory to keep his game in gear, though it is notable that he played at his very peak during his first two years as captain, when Ponting was still alongside him as a senior player and source of occasional advice.Clarke’s second innings at Derby was nothing special, and included a dropped catch. But he at least made a start, and by day’s end his feet were certainly better positioned than they had been for most of his halting first-innings stay at Lord’s. How much help Di Venuto provided only Clarke knows, but the captain would do well to listen to the advice of the batting coach over the next few days. Even if he would be well within his rights to stump up with the question that had once haunted Foster.

South Africa left feeling exposed minus Steyn

South Africa are still looking for someone to bowl the overs Jacques Kallis used to so well for them, and the intermittent absence of Dale Steyn of late has only amplified that issue

Firdose Moonda in Cape Town01-Mar-2014The first law of cricket stipulates that it is an 11-a-side sport, so you’d forgive Graeme Smith for wondering why he has had to play this series with just 10. For the third time in the three-match rubber, South Africa are a man down, and for the second time it has been one of their most important men: Dale Steyn.As South Africa saw when Steyn was off the field for significant periods of the first Test with an upset stomach, and as they have seen when he has been off the boil in the past, their attack without him is what the backdrop to Newlands would look like without Table Mountain. It lacks it’s most striking feature, which only serves to heighten the pressure on the rest of the pack.Morne Morkel has started to show he is capable of responding to that. He did it in Port Elizabeth, when he bowled the spell that Steyn said inspired the second-innings collapse and he almost did it here. After Steyn had left the field, Morkel set to work on Michael Clarke. But his encounter with the Australian captain resulted in bruises, not breakthroughs. More importantly, he lacked back-up.South Africa’s attack without Dale Steyn is what the backdrop to Newlands would look like without Table Mountain•Getty Images

Morkel’s spell ‘worth 2-3 wickets’ – Donald

Despite South Africa’s toils, their bowling coach Allan Donald praised Morne Morkel’s hostile bowling to Michael Clarke. Donald said it encapsulated the idea of “a series of pace and pain”.
“If you lose your gun bowler, and that’s Dale Steyn, the rest are going to have to step up. Morne Morkel was absolutely outstanding in what he was trying to create and the intensity that he bowled. That sort of spell is worth two to three wickets. He was very aggressive with lots of deliberate intent. He has taken that responsibility on himself. Michael Clarke showed a lot of guts. He fronted up today as the leader of this team and took a lot of blows.”
Asked why Morkel changed his angle for a brief period, Donald explained it was part of the experimentation. “When you do have a gut feel and you’ve attacked for a considerable amount of time from around the wicket, you want him to think about something else,” Donald said. “Morne deserved better. It was a great piece of theatre to see how he was roughing up the Australian captain.”

On a belter of a pitch perhaps no-one could expect a different outcome from the first day, but that doesn’t mean an examination of the efforts isn’t warranted. In particular, an examination of the fringe elements of the attack has to take place, because it is in the area of the fourth seamer and the spin department that South Africa have lacked in this series.In the three matches, they’ve tried three different people to bowl what used to be called the Jacques Kallis overs. They’re a balance between overs which keep the run-rate under control while allowing the three front-liners a breather and overs which are sent down when none of them can break through. Ryan McLaren looks the likeliest to fill that role, but he has not been given an extended opportunity.After concussion kept him out of the second Test, he may have fancied himself for a recall with Wayne Parnell being injured for this one, but South Africa decided to play what some would consider a stronger hand. Kyle Abbott is a swing bowler who has had success on the domestic circuit over the last two seasons. One of the problems was that, particularly in the morning session, there was not much swing to be found.Similarly, there wasn’t much in the way of seam movement and that frustrated Philander, who found himself under attack on his own turf. David Warner has already made known how little he thinks of Vernon Philander. He questioned the man Steyn calls the King of Newlands’ ability to bowl on pitches were there is little assistance after Philander pulled out of the Adelaide Test in November 2012 with a bad back and was bowling in the nets a couple of days later. Warner showed his disdain for him again today.While Philander was guilty of bowling too full, Warner went after him before any of the South Africans could get around to telling the opening what they thought of his accusation about their swing tactics in Port Elizabeth. The start Warner got off to is typical of his aggressive style of play, and it’s impact was obvious.Smith had to bring on spin, in the form of JP Duminy, who Shane Warne reminded the press is only a “part-time spinner”, in the 10th over. It wasn’t long after that that he had to spread the field and defend rather than concentrate on taking wickets. For the second half of Warner’s century, he was scoring at almost a run a ball in singles because of the space he was afforded.Donald said it became like bowling to Brian Lara because the South Africans knew any slight error in line or length would be punished and even the acceptable deliveries would be milked. They were soon on the receiving end of both. Their lengths remained too full, except for Morkel who did not offer a single pitched up ball in the spell he bowled to Clarke. Their two spinners were unable to contain and, perhaps as a result, unable to force an error.Between them, Duminy and Elgar conceded exactly 100 runs in the 24 overs they bowled. They allowed Australia to proceed at a comfortable rate of over four runs to the over and did not threaten a touch, apart from one ball when Elgar should have had Clarke caught at slip. They showed that South Africa probably need to rethink whether they will use a specialist spinner in future. Even though the pickings are slim, someone like Simon Harmer should be kept in mind because it seems South Africa cannot go without for too much longer.For now, their concern is responding immediately and Donald knows that can only be done with a change in mindset. “We have to come out with a brand new attitude tomorrow,” he said. “We have to have a lot of attitude and discipline and skill.”If they don’t, they will end up with more days like today and more reasons to question why they haven’t started planning for life without Steyn sooner. This is not a suggestion Steyn, who admitted to only having “three or four Newlands Tests left”, is close to the end. It is a reminder that all things end at some stage and that Steyn has not had an easy last few months. He picked up a rib injury during the India series earlier in the summer and had to take an extended break to facilitate a full recovery. He did not feature in the domestic 20-overs competition as a result.He started this series unwell in Centurion and looks likely to end it injured in Cape Town. Sandwiched between that he produced one of it’s most memorable spells in Port Elizabeth. What South Africa have to learn from all of that is they cannot continue to rely so heavily on one man alone because when they do, the biggest disservice they do is to themselves.

A man who speaks for a nation

Mahela Jayawardene is in touch with his country’s troubled past but is also the face of a brighter future

Wright Thompson04-Oct-2012Three years ago, the Sri Lankan cricket team rode through the streets of Lahore, Pakistan, on the third day of a Test match. Captain Mahela Jayawardene, who is to his country what Derek Jeter is to the city of New York, rode near the back of the bus. The convoy, with a police escort, rolled through the streets outside the stadium. Mahela, known as MJ, took out his phone to call his wife, and that’s when they all heard what sounded like fireworks. Someone shouted, “They’re shooting at the bus!” They heard the bullets, marching down the side exposed to the terrorist gunmen, sounding like rain on a metal roof. Mahela dived for the floor, and the first 30 seconds of what happened next ended up on Christina Jayawardene’s voicemail. An RPG flew over the bus. A grenade rolled under it. It was a blur: policemen being shot in the street, dying on a Tuesday morning, bullets striking the tires, players screaming. When she played the message for Mahela’s oldest friend, tears flowed down her face as he listened.”I got hit,” her husband shouted, and she heard the fear in his voice. Next his friend and fellow star Kumar Sangakkara, also a cricket legend, got hit with shrapnel, too, then another and another. Six in all were wounded, only one by a bullet. Soon, the bus driver would heroically drive them to safety, and Mahela would call the president of Sri Lanka on a private number, flexing for the first time anyone could remember, telling the politician to get him and his boys home. But on the floor of the bus, wounded by shrapnel and bleeding, Mahela felt sure that he’d die outside a stadium, killed for the crime of being a cricket star in a part of the world where the games seem to matter way more than they should.Three years later, today …Sri Lanka are in the semi-finals of the World Twenty20, playing Pakistan again, this time in the safety of Colombo. The island is a strange and beautiful place, with dark restaurants serving enormous pepper crab, white-front colonial hotels glowing in the distance. The deep blue of the Indian Ocean is visible out of every window, and like the ocean, there is a shadow of violence that’s never far away.Locals bring it up it casually, not because they don’t want you to know about the past, but because it was so common for so long that it doesn’t really rise to the level of news. The stadium where the game will be played, someone said the other day, is named after a president assassinated during the long civil war. A late-night party was at a boutique hotel, which had been the home to an assassinated prime minister who was shot on the balcony. Earlier in the week, at a local television and radio studio, Shanaka Amarasinghe, the host of the nation’s most popular sports talk show, pointed at the multiple layers of security inside the compound. During the war, he explained, thugs attacked and burned the place, in response to criticism.Waiting on the show to begin, Amarasinghe brought up a play called “The History Boys.” He recited a quote that described the challenge in Sri Lanka today: History is not something that involves the recent past. “We have no perspective on what we’ve just done,” he said.The civil war ended three years ago, about two months after the bus attack in Pakistan. Military scholars gush over the brutal simplicity of the government’s endgame: basically, they killed everyone in the leadership of the LTTE, the rebel army, known around the world as the Tamil Tigers. History will judge their actions, Amarasinghe said. Whatever comes next is still being sorted out. A knife’s edge, that’s where the country is, somewhere between the war of the past and the peace of the future. That’s what people talk about in the uncertain present, and in the middle of this painful conversation, there is a cricket tournament. Sri Lanka are in the semi-finals, two wins away from its first world title since 1996.”Right now,” Amarasinghe said, “we need a hero.”At the centre of many expectationsThe day before the game, Mahela sat in the Cinnamon Grand hotel, drinking tea with his wife and some friends. When he laughed, his whole face lightened and his shoulders heaved up and down. He laughs with his whole body. Christina and Mahela look like a cute couple, if that makes sense, and he seems to smile more when she’s around. As he made small talk, she leaned over to his ear and asked if he wanted a mocha, trying to make even the smallest thing easier. She wore a trendy green dress and carried a big Louis Vuitton Neverfull. When they first started dating, his friends wondered why he gave her so much control, and if that was healthy, but now they understand.Everyone looked at Mahela, but nobody interrupted his tea. The lobby is the future Sri Lanka wants for itself: the peaceful gurgle of a fountain, the piano in the bar, the chandeliers reflecting off buffed floors. In the back, sleek restaurants open onto the terraced pool. Outside the coffee shop, Kumar Sangakkara walked through the tables and saw his friend.Mahela Jayawardene and Kumar Sangakkara could afford a drink during their gigantic partnership•Getty ImagesMahela and Kumar – MJ and Sanga – are two of the best cricketers in the world, millionaires and subcontinent celebrities. They are often mentioned in the same breath – Coca-Cola billboards all over Colombo show them together, enjoying a cold bottle – and it’s together they’ve known their greatest success. Mahela is one of only six players, including Sachin Tendulkar, to score 10,000 runs in both Tests and one-day internationals. Kumar, a former captain, is close to becoming the seventh. Together, they hold the record for the highest score by a partnership in Test match history, 624 against South Africa, batting for nearly two and a half days. They are as connected in the history books as they are in the imagination of their countrymen.They also couldn’t be more different. Mahela is quiet and earnest. Kumar is boisterous and sophisticated. When Mahela is taken by a friend to meet a reporter, he apologetically asks if he might finish tea first. When Kumar is led across the hotel bar by one fan to meet another, he grins and hams it up, rolling his eyes. Mahela, with his open smile, looks like someone you would trust with your taxes. Kumar, with his Hollywood curls, looks like someone you wouldn’t trust with your sister. They are old and dear friends who’ve been on a journey only they really understand, walking together onto hostile pitches around the world, hiding on the floor of a wounded and smoking bus. When fans see them together in the lobby, they recognize one first – MJ! – and then the other – My God, Sanga! – and, by the time they’ve processed their luck in a double sighting of Sri Lankan cricket royalty, they’re about too flustered to speak.Mahela checks his watch. There’s a bowlers meeting in 40 minutes, and as team captain, he needs to fine-tune their strategy. He sits down, leans in, and in a quiet and steady voice, tells the story of his life, and Kumar’s life, and everyone who has lived in Sri Lanka for the past three decades of death and division. When he tells it, it is oddly a story of hope.”I grew up with the war,” he says. “I’m 35 years old. From six, seven years old, I remember the war, the bombs going off, and all that. I literally grew up – so that’s my generation.”The Lost Generation, foundThey never knew a Sri Lanka without conflict.Mahela grew up hearing explosions in Colombo. “I have two, three school friends who caught a couple of bombs,” he says. “I have a friend who still has shrapnel inside his body. He has to carry a certificate whenever he travels, going through machines and all that.” People his age learned the smell of burned bodies on the roadside and the sight of bloated corpses bobbing in the river. In 1983, during the violent riots where Sinhalese attacked their Tamil neighbours, Kumar’s Sinhalese father moved three dozen or so Tamils into his home and hid them from the roving squads of killers, like something out of Anne Frank. The children played in the yard until Kumar’s father would rush them upstairs to hide, in silence. Kumar crouched as the killers went door to door. The easy-going, good-looking cricket star on television has that in his memory.In the midst of this terror, they tried to do the normal things: playing sports, chasing dreams. Mahela, even at a young age, was a prodigy. The adults looked at him and predicted great success, and while Kumar is known for working harder than anyone else on the team, Mahela is known as someone who never stumbled on the jagged rocks of expectation. “He’s from a very average family,” says his oldest friend Sanjeewa Jayawardene, known to everyone as Java. “He had a younger brother, who also played cricket.”The brother was named Dhishal, and when Dhishal was 16, during an otherwise normal day at school, he collapsed. Doctors diagnosed a tumour, and Mahela’s father sold almost everything they owned, borrowing to make up the difference. He found enough money to fly to London to the best hospital they could find. Dhishal survived the first operation, but when the cancer returned, and his dad sold the rest of their possessions, he didn’t survive the second. He died and the family returned home, broke and broken. “Mahela had his bat and the shoes,” Java says. “When he came back, they didn’t have anything. Not a TV, nothing.”Mahela didn’t play cricket for months, his bat and shoes in the closet. Finally his team-mates convinced him to come back against their biggest rival. Even rusty, he dominated, and from that moment on, his destiny was clear. He’d be the best batsman in his country. Success came quickly, and everything he made, he used to pay off his family’s hospital debts. His cricket success would always be tied to the loss of his brother, which he hates to talk about. When cricket media want to do documentaries, he bristles when they use photographs of Dhishal because he knows his parents will watch, and he knows the sight of his brother will make them cry. His new friends don’t know much about Dhishal, and his old ones know not to ask. But the memory is there, just one of many scars for a child of Sri Lanka’s civil war. In his hotel room, Java says in the lobby of the Cinnamon Grand, he always sets up a shrine. Two photographs, one of his wife, the other of his brother, happy and very much alive, which is how Dhishal is best remembered.Mahela takes that photograph everywhere he travels.LeadingKumar Sangakkara delivered a passionate Spirit of Cricket lecture•Matt BrightSeveral years ago, Mahela finished a high-profile Test match down the coast in Galle, against England, the former colonial overlords. Test matches are physically and mentally exhausting, more so for the captain. In American sports, the captain is a largely ceremonial title. In cricket, he makes every decision about on-field strategy. Mahela led Sri Lanka to a hard-fought draw in the Test match – and a victory in the overall series – scoring a 213, not out, which is like going for 55 points in a basketball game.The next morning, with Java shaking his head, Mahela said his local cricket club in Colombo had a game, and he thought he should show up and play. Imagine Tiger Woods winning the Masters, then humping it back for a low-profile pro-am. Java said Mahela even called the club and apologised that he’d be at the grounds only an hour and a half before the first ball instead of the customary two hours.In the execution of a fielding strategy he designed, he sprinted across the pitch after each over, putting himself in the most difficult position instead of delegating it, and his hunch paid off: in the closing overs of the match, a long ball came straight to him, and he caught it. Being a cricket captain, like being someone a nation can look up to, isn’t about grand pronouncements. It requires a series of small actions, repeated over and over, day after day.Lessons about powerJava tells a story about his friend.This happened a few years back, a month after finishing a crushing second in the 2007 World Cup. It was during the war, when checkpoints regularly stopped traffic on the highways. Java and Mahela, the team captain, rode back late at night from a friend’s funeral. Java drove. It was dark and empty on the garrison road. The troops stopped them. It was dark, the soldiers focused and on edge, the cricket star was out of context. Java was exhausted and needed to get home. “Tell him who you are,” Java begged. “I won’t,” Mahela said.Java laughs now in the hotel lobby. “This guy asked for the ID,” he says, “so he gave him the ID. The ID doesn’t say ‘Mahela Jayawardene,’ it says ‘Denagamage Proboth Mahela de Silva Jayawardene.’ Even if you read it, it doesn’t click, unless you look for it, you know?”They waited on the soldiers to finish searching their car and then drove on to town. Java was annoyed and wanted to know why Mahela wouldn’t do something so simple that would speed up their day. “I may play cricket,” he said, “but let them do their job.”It’s just a little example, a random moment, but in Sri Lanka, where everyone uses whatever influence they can accumulate, it is significant. Last Sunday’s newspaper carried a typical full-page story about a top official’s son who allegedly pulled a gun on a general – a tour de force of dropped names and threats – and during a civil war, people learned lessons about power quickly and simply: if you don’t have it, get it; when you have it, use it. Mahela had power, and he wouldn’t spend it on his own convenience. In a time of war, that might make him naive. But in a nation trying to reinvent itself as place of peace, that makes him a star in the sky.A healingMahela tells a story about himself, about Sri Lanka’s past and future, and what a cricket game can mean. Everyone knows how many people died when the tsunami hit Thailand in 2004, but not as many know that the same waves roared ashore in Sri Lanka, in both the south and the war-torn north. More than 30,000 people lost their lives. Many just disappeared, washed out to sea. The government and the rebels stopped fighting, and the cricket team, one of the only things each side could agree on, went north to carry aid. They found that rebel soldiers, who’d been fighting a guerilla war for decades, knew their results and their records. Like any other fans, they made suggestions about lineup changes, and offered opinions on who could bat best against offspinners. Mahela said that standing in a war-zone, hearing the people he knew as the enemy talking with such passion and ownership about the Sri Lankan cricket team, he left with the hope that they might one day feel that way about something else, and then something else, until a broken nation is whole again.The possibilities and limitationsThere are, of course, limits to what a cricket star can do, to what a team winning a game can accomplish, and if Sri Lanka’s World Cup victory in 1996 proves anything, it’s that cynicism and violence can squander any momentary wave of joy.But they can raise money and carry supplies to the north, and they can play hard and win. They can address small problems. They can show up at a club match after a five-day Test. They can battle the corruption and cynicism that could drag Sri Lanka back to its past, a circle of petty score-settling and division. They can accumulate power and try their best to use it for good.Kumar, who is really a brilliant speaker and writer, chose the most public forum possible. The Marylebone Cricket Club in London, the self-proclaimed guardians of the game, invited him to give the annual Spirit of Cricket Cowdrey Lecture. He was the first active cricketer to do so. A friend asked if he needed help. Kumar smiled and said no. He knew just what the moment required. He gave no quarter, standing before a room of cricket legends and a bank of cameras. Most headlines at home came from his unsparing and specific criticism against the corruption in Sri Lankan cricket. Sitting in the hotel lobby, Mahela laughs about the speech and the fallout that followed. “I knew it would be interesting knowing Kumar,” Mahela says, seeming even a little in awe of his articulate friend.Mahela has fought this battle, too, in his own way. In 2009, he resigned the captaincy, in part because he grew tired of fighting the backroom power plays. Sri Lanka’s own sports minister once described the cricket board as the third most corrupt organisation in the country, behind the schools and the police. Mahela didn’t need power that bad. Ten months ago, he returned to the job. His team needed him, and you can’t help but think that, at least in part, it’s because he knows what an important time this is. The end of his career is much closer than the beginning, and the new Sri Lanka will be made in the next few years, by people his age, the ones who inherited the war and saw it end.”You want to take that ownership,” Mahela says. “This is a great opportunity for our generation to try and bridge that gap and then help the next generation to heal by itself. Our generation has been through the war, so that emotionally, it’ll be tough for them, but for the next generation it’ll be much easier.”They can set an example. That’s what Kumar’s speech was, really: the example, and the lessons, of a generation. The story of Mahela, and Dhishal, and the Sinhalese who attacked their neighbours and the Tamils hiding in Kumar’s house, of the Sri Lankans who will cheer today, and of those who will play.Mahela Jayawardene with wife Christina after the horrors of Lahore ’09•AFPKumar talked about the riots. He wove his life through bombs, and the fear, and the hope, the arc following the history of cricket, and how it could provide the road map for a new country. The most emotional part, for him and for listeners, came when describing what happened after the assassination attempt in Pakistan. At a checkpoint a week later, a soldier asked if his injuries were healing. Kumar said everything felt good, and that he suffered only a few moments of gunfire, while soldiers are threatened by it daily. The soldier’s answer stuck with Kumar.”It is OK if I die,” he said, “Because it is my job and I am ready for it. But you are a hero and if you were to die it would be a great loss for our country.”Beyond the mythThere’s a photograph you should look at during the match, especially when Mahela makes the long walk from the pavilion to the centre of the pitch, with a nation holding its breath. It’s the other side of soldiers calling cricketers heroes, and it’s much closer to the truth. The photograph was taken after the terrorist attack in Pakistan, when the players returned safely home, landing at the airport in Colombo. Officials showed up to greet them, and maybe end up on the news. Parents showed up for the younger players, wives and children for the older ones. Christina arrived without her usual calm and polish, rushing to wrap her arms around Mahela. The homecoming was a nationalist outpouring of love, relief and anger, a chance for cricket to again carry water for big ideas that have nothing to do with bowling a ball, or batting it. A photographer caught the couple walking away, and he seems exhausted, and she seems pale, and all around them, there is chaos. But look at the bottom of the picture. They are holding hands, fingers locked tight, a husband and a wife doing the best they can in a part of the world where the games seem to matter way more than they should.

Freeze frames

From Afridi’s pointed finger to Broad’s misfield to save by Mathews – they’re all in our look back at the moments that defined the tournament

Nishi Narayanan22-Jun-2009The celebration
Is it a plane? Is it a “you-can’t-see-me” hand wave? Or a six-foot high leap? No, it’s a finger pointed to the sky by Shahid Afridi. Instead of indulging in wild revelry, clearly the favoured style of lesser bowlers, Boom Boom simply stood tall and let his team-mates embrace him.The six
Brett Lee had been walloped for 24 runs in his first two overs but Chris Gayle was not done yet. He hit the first delivery of the third high over midwicket and the ball went sailing into the adjoining Archbishop Tennyson School. Two more sixes and two more fours later, Lee’s figures were 3-0-51-0.The barrage
There were 166 sixes in the tournament, three of them by Ireland’s Niall O’Brien in one Mashrafe Mortaza over. The first, off a slower ball, was flicked to midwicket; the second clipped high over square leg; the third scoop-flicked over square leg, by which time O’Brien was limping and in need of a runner.The scoop
Before the tournament, the Scoop was known to be an Evelyn Waugh novel, or for movie-goers, a film by Woody Allen. But henceforth it shall be associated only with Tillakaratne Dilshan. The world premiere of the shot was aired on June 8 at Trent Bridge. Dilshan had raced to 46 off 25 balls against a hapless Australian attack when he ducked under a good-length ball and flicked his bat vertically to lift it over the keeper – like the paddle but straight.The bouncer
Injuries to Virender Sehwag and Zaheer Khan had already left India’s Twenty20 squad weak but West Indies’ and England’s bowlers found another chink in their armour – their batsmen’s inability to play the short ball – and let ’em have it. The most painful to watch was Suresh Raina. James Anderson and Ryan Sidebottom pinged him with bouncers in their opening overs and he flayed at them, playing and missing the first and gloving the second. Sidebottom then bounced Gautam Gambhir, who played it to gully for a single. Raina faced Sidebottom, and tried to hook the fast bouncer. Instead he got an edge that spiralled away, to be caught by a diving Luke Wright.Stuart Broad’s misfield gave Netherlands a historic win•Associated PressThe peach
With most of the women’s games tucked away in Taunton and not televised, not many will have witnessed the catches, celebrations, and wickets of this tournament. However, the semis and final, played in the same grounds as the men’s games, and broadcast by Sky, gave viewers a chance to see the best of women’s cricket. One of those moments featured New Zealand’s 25-year-old left-arm seamer Sian Ruck on her first international tour. Ruck swung it into the right-handers and had India’s Harmanpreet Kaur completely befuddled when she pitched a ball on middle and it flattened the leg stump.The misfield
As if Yuvraj Singh’s six sixes weren’t haunting him enough, Stuart Broad added more grief to his three-year-old international career with a slip-up that cost England the game against the Netherlands. Two were needed off the last ball, which Edgar Schiferli hit towards mid-on. Broad intercepted it and threw it at the non-striker’s stumps but missed completely – from a range of about four metres – to give an overthrow that allowed Netherlands to get the winning run.The stunt
He did it in the ODIs against West Indies to no effect, but young Broad wasn’t quite giving up yet. In the 17th over against South Africa at Trent Bridge, as he approached his delivery stride, he pointed off to the side, as if to indicate a fielder was out of position, but carried on with his bowling action without disrupting his own rhythm. AB de Villiers worked the ball behind square for a single and later Broad was warned not to repeat his antics.The fielding
Scotland’s Kyle Coetzer literally plucked one out of thin air against South Africa when he ran backwards at long-on and grabbed it in his outstretched right hand before falling just short of the boundary rope, to dismiss Mark Boucher.Kyle Coetzer pulled off a stunning catch to dismiss Mark Boucher•Getty ImagesAnother stunning catch came in Pakistan’s game against New Zealand, by Afridi, running towards the long-on boundary, to dismiss Scott Styris. The ball rose high and looked like it would land safely but Afridi ran hard from mid-on and lunged in the end, four or five metres from the boundary to take it safely.Angelo Mathews rounds up our fielding-brilliance-at-long-on section with the quickest thinking ever in international cricket. Ramnaresh Sarwan smashed the ball down the ground and Mathews took a great overhead catch before realising the momentum would take him over the boundary. So instead he threw the ball in the air, went over the boundary, leapt up and smashed it, tennis-style, back into play.The opening over
Having shown his tennis skills off at Trent Bridge, Mathews unleashed his cricketing ones at The Oval in the semi-final, against the same side, with an opening over that sealed the game for Sri Lanka. He got Xavier Marshall to play on to the first ball, bowled Lendl Simmons round his legs, and knocked Dwayne Bravo’s off stump over after the batsman inside-edged one that pitched on a length outside off. West Indies were 3 for 1 at the end of the first over with little chance of coming back.Pakistan rookie Mohammad Aamer paid it forward to Sri Lanka in the final and though he took only one wicket in the opening over, it was equal to three since it was the one of Dilshan, the Player of the Tournament. After failing to score off the first four balls – all short – Dilshan went for his scoop and mistimed it, to be caught at short fine-leg.

Pollard 'sick and fed up' of people picking on Hardik Pandya

MI’s batting coach Kieron Pollard believes fans will ‘sing Hardik’s praises’ soon after another disappointing loss

S Sudarshanan15-Apr-20241:40

Pollard to Hardik’s critics: ‘Stop nitpicking’

Hardik Pandya looked forlorn. He had walked out to bat with Mumbai Indians’ asking rate just under 13, and by the time he was dismissed – for 2 off 6 balls – it had shot up close to 17. He paused on his walk back and joined the MI group that included the head coach Mark Boucher and batting coach Kieron Pollard as the timeout was taken.A couple of hours earlier, Hardik took the responsibility of bowling the last over for Mumbai and gave away 26 as MS Dhoni smacked three successive sixes to help Chennai Super Kings to an unlikely 206. That total proved to be enough for Super Kings to script a 20-run win despite an unbeaten 105 from Rohit Sharma.Pollard threw his weight behind MI’s under-fire captain Hardik and said everyone “will be singing his praises when time comes”.Related

Hardik turns to 16-year-old self to get out of 'difficult phase' in his career

Irfan Pathan: 'Sometimes having a celebrity culture does not help India at all'

Bumrah's missing No. 2, Hardik's flat homecoming and other reasons why MI flunked IPL 2024

Hardik says MI undone by CSK bowlers' 'smart approach'

Pathirana's four-for overshadows Rohit's ton as Mumbai go down

“I don’t know if it will affect his confidence. He is a confident guy, he has been great around the group,” Pollard said after Mumbai’s fourth loss in six outings in IPL 2024. “In cricket, you have good days and bad days and I am seeing an individual who is working bloody hard to improve his skills and plying his trade.”I am sick and fed up of [us] looking to pinpoint individuals; cricket is a team game at the end of the day. This is an individual that is going to represent the country in less than six weeks’ time, and all are going to cheer him and want him to do well. So high time we try to encourage and stop nitpicking and see if we can get the best out of one of the great allrounders India has produced. He can bat, bowl and field, and has a X-factor about him.”I hope very well deep down within my heart that when he comes out on top, I’ll sit back and watch everyone sing his praises.”After the pre-season IPL trade, Hardik has been the subjected to jeers from the fans in Ahmedabad (where his former team Gujarat Titans is based) and Hyderabad in their first two games, and a similar treatment has continued in Mumbai’s home games, too. But his form this season has been a concern.1:35

Gavaskar on Hardik: ‘Ordinary bowling, ordinary captaincy’

Returning from an ankle injury suffered during the ODI World Cup last year, he has scored 131 runs at a strike rate of 145.55 and picked up three wickets but at a high economy of 12. In his first stint with Mumbai – from 2015 to 2021 – Hardik averaged 27.33 with the bat but struck at 153.91. In his two years with Titans, whom he captained, his average shot up to 37.86 – he played in the middle order and anchored their innings – while the strike rate came down to 133.49.On Sunday, he pulled a short ball from Tushar Deshpande straight to Ravindra Jadeja at deep midwicket on the longer part of the ground.”As an individual you have to evolve,” Pollard said of Hardik’s batting methods. “When you are young, you have the youthful exuberance. You go out and do things in a certain manner. The older you get, accountability and responsibility kick in.”What I am seeing is the guy is evolving. We, as individuals, want to see certain things but sometimes the game does not demand certain things and [players] are going to make mistakes as you go along, as we all have done. The individual has put in the work and hard work pays off. So, all of us will be singing his praises when time comes.”Speaking on ESPNcricinfo TimeOut, former Sunrisers Hyderabad coach Tom Moody felt Hardik has the right support staff at Mumbai.”As good a player Hardik Pandya is, he has got to earn the respect of the dressing room and his fans,” Moody said. “He’s finding that difficult because no one’s letting him in at the moment. What would have made it easier is if they would have won their first three games in a row, and it would have been business as usual. We wouldn’t be this far down the road with regards to talking about it.”It is a challenge. He has got a lot of good people around him though. You look in that dugout there’s a lot of experience around him – a lot of international experience, a lot of IPL experience and on the field. That’s what he needs to draw from. He needs to take onboard support from that experience and try to get this ship turned in the right direction.”

Campanha de conscientização Abril Azul leva a campo crianças autistas que torcem por Fluminense e Flamengo

MatériaMais Notícias

A decisão do Campeonato Carioca, entre Fluminense e Flamengo, foi antecedida por um momento de utilizar o esporte como inclusão. Na campanha do Abril Azul, promovida pela Secretaria Estadual de Esporte e Lazer e pela Suderj, crianças autistas que torcem pelas duas equipes entraram no gramado do Maracanã.

O objetivo da campanha é utilizar o esporte como forma de pedir inclusão e respeito. Jogadores dos dois times posaram com a faixa do projeto.

continua após a publicidadeRelacionadasFora de CampoTorcedores do Flamengo se revoltam após primeiro tempo da final: ‘Humilhação’Fora de Campo09/04/2023FluminenseFluminense divulga relacionados para final contra o Flamengo; jogador importante retornaFluminense09/04/2023

A campanha tinha sido lançado no Maracanã no primeiro jogo da final, no sábado anterior (1) e teve a presença do governador Cláudio Castro.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus